[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#250564: marked as done (RFP: wipe2fs -- Wipe Unused Space in Ext2/3 Filesystems)



Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:53 -0600
with message-id <E1EICe5-0004Wo-00@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2004 20:47:39 +0000
>From johannes@sipsolutions.de Sun May 23 13:47:39 2004
Return-path: <johannes@sipsolutions.de>
Received: from pd952581e.dip.t-dialin.net (johannes.sipsolutions.com) [217.82.88.30] (foobar)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BRzsh-0002BK-00; Sun, 23 May 2004 13:47:39 -0700
Received: from laptop.johannes.sipsolutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by johannes.sipsolutions.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 34B941516C27; Sun, 23 May 2004 22:47:36 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: wipe2fs -- Wipe Unused Space in Ext2/3 Filesystems
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.59
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 22:47:34 +0200
Message-Id: <20040523204736.34B941516C27@johannes.sipsolutions.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

* Package name    : wipe2fs
  Version         : 0.1.0
  Upstream Author : Chuan-kai Lin <b86506063@ntu.edu.tw>/<linchuan@cse.ogi.edu>
* URL             : http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~linchuan/wipe2fs/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : Wipe Unused Space in Ext2/3 Filesystems

This users-pace program locates unused space in ext2/3 filesystems and 
overwrites the space with zero or pseudo-random numbers.

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (400, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Johannes Berg (SIP Solutions)
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=udya
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 250564-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 22:00:54 +0000
>From damog@merkel.debian.org Wed Sep 21 15:00:54 2005
Return-path: <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EICe6-0005Gm-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:00:54 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EICe5-0004Wo-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:53 -0600
To: 250564-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <E1EICe5-0004Wo-00@merkel.debian.org>
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:53 -0600
Delivered-To: 250564-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 450 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 250564
thanks bts

Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
250564@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* RFPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.

A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 20 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500



Reply to: