[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#315297: Fedora Directory Server port to Debian ?

Op zo, 07-08-2005 te 09:43 -0700, schreef Russ Allbery:
> Paul Wise <pabs3@bonedaddy.net> writes:
> >> Is somebody working on porting/packaging FDS to Debian?
> > http://bugs.debian.org/315297
> Bad package description.  It tells me something I don't care about (namely
> the acronym expansion of LDAP) and none of the things I do care about (why
> would I want this package rather than some other directory server).
> > As far as I can tell, there is no-one packaging it yet, feel free to
> > contribute, I imagine that it would be good to have this in debian.
> Out of curiousity, why?  I can't think of any reason to run FDS when we
> already have OpenLDAP, having had the experience of dealing with FDS's
> technological predecessor.

Having had experience dealing with OpenLDAP, I'd be happy to have
just /anything/ else.

That being said, there's nothing wrong with having multiple
implementations of the same thing -- on the contrary. We have multiple
implementations of DNS-servers, MTA's, MUA's, database servers,
browsers, user environments, and whatnot. Why not multiple LDAP servers?

The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond

Reply to: