On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 13:48 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: > Severity #307366 Grave > Merge #307784 #307366 > Thanks dear bugtracking system. > > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:10:17PM +0200, Primoz wrote: > > Is there a way to revert the upload to the NMUed one (which had security > > problems fixed), so package stays in sarge. I would need at least a week > > to 14 days to port pam-mysql to pgsql (which seems like the best way to > > go). > > Yes: Release a new package containing the changes of the NMU. The > simplest and fastest way is to download the sources from > http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2004/11/13/debian/pool/main/p/pam-pgsql/, > include the NMU changelog entries (i.e. copy debian/changelog from the > current source) and re-release it without other source changes as > 0.5.2-9 or higher. > > Micha I created the package alread ... just waiting for sponsor. > Hello, > > I was able to do it sooner than I thought. The package is on > > http://hydra.aufbix.org/~primoz/debian/ > > I did about 2 hours of testing on it with different options and I'm > almost confident I didn't break anything. I fixed a few things (check > the changelog). Is package OK? What do I have to do next? > > Primoz Bratanic Primoz Bratanic
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part