Bug#137915: Renamed to 'pm-base'

[Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>]

Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk> cum veritate scripsit:

> > Is "powermanagement-base" not an option?
> > If it's a package that normal users won't install directly, 
> > it won't cause too much trouble, even if the package name is longish.
> 
> Can you come up with a shorter suggestion?

My suggestion was that package name length doesn't matter
if it is a common package depended by apmd, and acpid,
and thus keep is long and explanatory.

regards,
	junichi



-- 
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4