On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 19:53, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Is "powermanagement-base" not an option? > If it's a package that normal users won't install directly, > it won't cause too much trouble, even if the package name is longish. Can you come up with a shorter suggestion?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part