Bug#110803: openjade, opensp
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> writes:
> Current status: I have built a potato package of 1.3 (since this is what I
> needed for work), but being based on the jade 1.2 sid package I guess it can
> be rebuilt for sid with little problems.
You mean the latest Jade 1.2.1 right? I think it would be easier to
derive from the openjade in unstable because the jade package includes
sp and jade and two lib packages rather than one, so openjade is
closer...
> If you intend to modernize the jade 1.2 packaging, I can update the package
> then.
What's so non-modern about it?
> Also, I have potato rebuilds of opensp, jadetex, docbook-dsssl, and a couple
> of things, all done for work, which I'll put on the alcove-labs.org apt
> repository ASAP. Should register it in the page of unofficial apt sources
> as well.
I might be interested in that for work.... what's the URL?
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<adam@onshore-devel.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
Reply to: