Bug#110802: openjade, opensp
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 11:46:15AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Current status: I have built a potato package of 1.3 (since this is what I
> > needed for work), but being based on the jade 1.2 sid package I guess it can
> > be rebuilt for sid with little problems.
>
> You mean the latest Jade 1.2.1 right? I think it would be easier to
> derive from the openjade in unstable because the jade package includes
> sp and jade and two lib packages rather than one, so openjade is
> closer...
I had tried that first but it required more work. Eg, the configure
switches have changed. From 1.2.1 I find it quite direct.
> > If you intend to modernize the jade 1.2 packaging, I can update the package
> > then.
>
> What's so non-modern about it?
You said something about "transition to the new sgml-base system".
Ah, now that you ask, I think debhelper could be used more in the
rules file (and I think I did that).
> > Also, I have potato rebuilds of opensp, jadetex, docbook-dsssl, and a couple
> > of things, all done for work, which I'll put on the alcove-labs.org apt
> > repository ASAP. Should register it in the page of unofficial apt sources
> > as well.
>
> I might be interested in that for work.... what's the URL?
www.alcove-labs.org. The apt-source line should be mentionned
somewhere. But the SGML stuff is not there yet - I'll tell you when
it is.
CC: me@work as a reminder :)
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <dirson@debian.org> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro: <yann.dirson@fr.alcove.com> | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
Reply to: