[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#123456: ITP: eazel-engine -- Crux theme for GTK+

On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:43:13AM +0100, Filip Van Raemdonck <mechanix@debian.org> was heard to say:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:36:28PM +0100, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > > * Package name    : eazel-engine
> > > 
> > > This is the upstream (and source) package name, binary will most likely be
> > > gtk-theme-crux.
> > 
> > This actually is a real engine, not just a theme, so i'd prefer the name
> > gtk-engines-eazel or gtk-engines-crux
> About these names: check the thread on debian-devel a couple of messages
> before my ITP (subject: [RFC] GTK+ theme naming).
> Daniel Burrows (who has packaged a couple of other themes) seemed to agree
> that gtk-engines-* is probably (most likely) not the best name for these
> packages.

  It may not be the best one, but I think that we should be consistent
now that we have a convention.  We can worry about moving to a better
naming scheme in the future.

> No, you're correct - it does require compilation.
> Hmmm... maybe it would be useful to put the actual engine and theme in a
> separate package. (and that would probably make most sense, wrt. naming of
> the various binary packages too)

  I don't see any benefit from this.


/-------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> -------------------\
|                      Put no trust in cryptic comments.                      |
\-Evil Overlord, Inc: planning your future today. http://www.eviloverlord.com-/

Reply to: