[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#97234: Debian Packaging of Subversion

Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 09:26:23PM +0000 wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:59:14PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> > 1. Berkeley db 3.3 - a bug has been filed (http::/bugs.debian.org/109853)
> > I have been building with the preliminary packages on
> > people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/.
> db3 is priority: required and is therefore frozen for the woody release.
> with 5 days to go until everything which depends on it is locked down,
> i'm less than keen on touching it.

FWIW, the db3.3-3.3.11 packages at people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/
were put together so that they can co-exist with the current db3
packages in much the same way that the db2 packages can co-exist
with the db3 pacakges.  With that in mind it isn't a question of
touching db3, rather the question is do we add db3.3 packages to the
archive.  I understand if you don't want to do that.

> > Subversion will make its way into Debian shortly after these
> > dependancies.  With this mail I am poking the respective maintainers
> > to see where we stand.
> No subversion for woody.  I'll get db 3.3 sorted out once woody is out
> of the way.

I see where you are coming from.  I would, however, like to make
subversion available soon if possible.  I can just leave the packages
on people.debian.org, though there has been some discussion of moving
them to experimental.  


Reply to: