Hi ... On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 05:41:28PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >* Jan-Hendrik Palic <jan.palic@linux-debian.de> [20011101 15:19]: >> > I think you should do an ITA aswell... to make sure no-one else is >> > doing the same? >> Can you file a wnpp-bug for these packages relating to gtranscript, >> so I can retitle the bugreports to ITA? >Michel doesn't have time to fix his packages and now you want him to >post useless wnpp bugs? Well, I wanted to file a ITA withy reportbug wnpp, but i wasn't possible, so I asked a debian-developper and I answered, the usual way is, first RFA, than a retiitle to ITA. But I will do so, file a wnpp bug, ITA's for these packages. Regards Jan -- One time, you all will be emulated by linux! ---- Jan- Hendrik Palic Url:"http://www.billgotchy.de"; E-Mail: "palic@billgotchy.de" -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a-- C++ UL++ P+++ L+++ E W++ N+ o+ K- w--- O- M- V- PS++ PE Y+ PGP++ t--- 5- X+++ R-- tv- b++ DI-- D+++ G+++ e+++ h+ r++ z+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
pgpBb61blFj8C.pgp
Description: PGP signature