[pkg-wine-party] Bug#821880: marked as done (wine: libgnutls30 and libgnutls30:i386 conflict when trying to install wine32)
Your message dated Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:33:19 +0200
with message-id <571768FF.1000503@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#821880: wine: libgnutls30 and libgnutls30:i386 conflict when trying to install wine32
has caused the Debian Bug report #821880,
regarding wine: libgnutls30 and libgnutls30:i386 conflict when trying to install wine32
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
821880: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821880
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wine
Version: 1.8.1-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I attempted to install wine. I ran "sudo aptitude install wine". After trying
to run the piece of software in wine it came back with a "wine: Bad EXE format" error.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
After googling I attempted to install wine32. Here is the aptitude output:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
yghazal@yghazalThinkpad:~$ sudo aptitude install wine32
Note: selecting "wine32:i386" instead of the virtual package "wine32"
The following NEW packages will be installed:
i965-va-driver:i386{a} libasound2:i386{a} libasound2-plugins:i386{a} libasyncns0:i386{a} libattr1:i386{a} libavcodec57:i386{a} libavresample3:i386{a} libavutil55:i386{a} libcap2:i386{a} libcrystalhd3:i386{a} libdb5.3:i386{a} libdbus-1-3:i386{a}
libflac8:i386{a} libfontconfig1:i386{a} libfreetype6:i386{a} libgcrypt20:i386{a} libglib2.0-0:i386{a} libglu1-mesa:i386{a} libgmp10:i386{a} libgnutls30:i386{ab} libgomp1:i386{a} libgpg-error0:i386{a} libgpm2:i386{a} libgsm1:i386{a} libhogweed4:i386{a}
libice6:i386{a} libicu55:i386{a} libidn11:i386{a} libjack-jackd2-0:i386{a} libjson-c3:i386{a} liblcms2-2:i386{a} libldap-2.4-2:i386{a} liblzma5:i386{a} libmp3lame0:i386{a} libmpg123-0:i386{a} libncurses5:i386{a} libnettle6:i386{a} libnuma1:i386{a}
libogg0:i386{a} libopenal1:i386{a} libopenjpeg5:i386{a} libopus0:i386{a} liborc-0.4-0:i386{a} libp11-kit0:i386{a} libpcap0.8:i386{a} libpcre3:i386{a} libpng16-16:i386{a} libpulse0:i386{a} libsamplerate0:i386{a} libsasl2-2:i386{a} libsasl2-modules:i386{a}
libsasl2-modules-db:i386{a} libschroedinger-1.0-0:i386{a} libselinux1:i386{a} libshine3:i386{a} libsm6:i386{a} libsnappy1v5:i386{a} libsndfile1:i386{a} libsoxr0:i386{a} libspeex1:i386{a} libspeexdsp1:i386{a} libssl1.0.2:i386{a} libswresample2:i386{a}
libswscale4:i386{a} libsystemd0:i386{a} libtasn1-6:i386{a} libtheora0:i386{a} libtwolame0:i386{a} libuuid1:i386{a} libva-x11-1:i386{a} libva1:i386{a} libvdpau-va-gl1:i386{a} libvdpau1:i386{a} libvorbis0a:i386{a} libvorbisenc2:i386{a} libvpx3:i386{a}
libwavpack1:i386{a} libwebp5:i386{a} libwine:i386{a} libwrap0:i386{a} libx264-148:i386{a} libx265-79:i386{a} libxcursor1:i386{a} libxi6:i386{a} libxml2:i386{a} libxrender1:i386{a} libxtst6:i386{a} libxvidcore4:i386{a} libzvbi0:i386{a}
mesa-vdpau-drivers:i386{a} ocl-icd-libopencl1:i386{a} va-driver-all:i386{a} vdpau-driver-all:i386{a} vdpau-va-driver:i386{a} wine32:i386
0 packages upgraded, 95 newly installed, 0 to remove and 54 not upgraded.
Need to get 52.6 MB of archives. After unpacking 269 MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libgnutls30 : Breaks: libgnutls30:i386 (!= 3.4.10-4) but 3.4.11-3 is to be installed
libgnutls30:i386 : Breaks: libgnutls30 (!= 3.4.11-3) but 3.4.10-4 is installed
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
Keep the following packages at their current version:
1) libgnutls30:i386 [Not Installed]
2) libldap-2.4-2:i386 [Not Installed]
3) libwine:i386 [Not Installed]
4) wine32:i386 [Not Installed]
Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pressing Y will install nothing, pressing n will give me an alternative outcome in
which it unisntalls quite a few packages such as libreoffice, network-manager etc.
I then tried rm -rf ~/.wine and installing libwine and wine-development before running
wine. this time it tells me
Could not load wine-gecko. HTML rendering will be disabled.
Could not load wine-gecko. HTML rendering will be disabled.
* What was the outcome of this action?
I am currently still unable to use wine.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
That it would work.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages wine depends on:
ii wine64 1.8.1-2
wine recommends no packages.
Versions of packages wine suggests:
pn dosbox <none>
pn wine-binfmt <none>
Versions of packages wine is related to:
ii fonts-wine 1.8.1-2
ii wine 1.8.1-2
pn wine32 <none>
ii wine64 1.8.1-2
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 04/20/2016 09:12 AM, Yusef Ghazal wrote:
> * What led up to the situation?
> I attempted to install wine. I ran "sudo aptitude install wine". After trying
> to run the piece of software in wine it came back with a "wine: Bad EXE format" error.
> * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> ineffective)?
> After googling I attempted to install wine32. Here is the aptitude output:
This is the correct solution for the observed problem. See Adam's
comment why it fails atm in a pure sid environment. You may use some
packages from stretch (testing) to workaround this temporarily.
> I then tried rm -rf ~/.wine and installing libwine and wine-development before running
> wine. this time it tells me
libwine and wine-development are from different wine versions. There is
one set of wine packages for wine (stable) without suffix, and another
one for wine (development branch) with the suffix -development. So the
one doesn't help when working the other. Yet it also doesn't hurt.
You need wine, wine32 and libwine:i386 (or alternatively
wine-development, wine32-development and libwine-development:i386) to
run 32-bit Windows applications.
> Could not load wine-gecko. HTML rendering will be disabled.
> Could not load wine-gecko. HTML rendering will be disabled.
This is a non-critical error, see #783428 and #812750. A workaround
(install wine-gecko manually) is described in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783428#35.
Greets
jre
--- End Message ---
Reply to: