[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PEAR policy recommendations



> for the rest, I think I agree you do everything that has to be done, and 
> much simplier than me. but please think at the .registry again. let 
> think at the fact that PEAR may change their packaging format/methods 
> without warning ... and if they do that ... let's say ... 2-3 monthes 
> before etch ... that would *really* suck ...

Well, you have a valid point. Perhaps this is the way to go.

> I agree with you for all the rest, but I'm still convinced we *have* to 
> let PEAR deal with its stuff, it's his job, his own, his dirty 
> personnal intimate one. You don't want seriously to toy with it (IMHO).

Then hopefully you can move forward on updating/moving your webpage. :-)
Most notably, you should be able to avoid creating the tarball
dynamically, and simply install using package.xml.

I also hope that dh-make-pear can either implement these "policy"
decisions, or bring them back to the table for further discussion.

Charles

-- 
Her chariot
Raced 80 per
They hauled away
What had
Ben Her
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1950/her_chariot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: