On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:24:30AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Me neither, but putting the proposed scripts into dbconfig-common > would be equally sane for me. what would make the most sense to me would be to spend some time together developing the interface scripts, host them in postgresql-common, and then provide a bunch of wrappers, logic, and debconf templates in dbconfig-common. that way the stuff that actually mucks with the config file is owned by the package that owns the config file, which makes things perhaps a little clearer wrt policy? i need to sit down and double check that this is feasible before i completely sign off on it, but that's the direction i'd lean for the time being. sean --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature