[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: please give back exadrums in experimental on armel mips mipsel m68k powerpc powerpcspe sh4



Hi,

Nicolas Boulenguez <nicolas@debian.org> (2019-04-27):
> Exadrums and libexadrums are two distinct source packages (despite
> similar version numbers for now).  As the names suggest, the former
> links with the latter. It is the only consumer for now.
> Both are in experimental because they have been introduced during the freeze.
> 
> There was a bug in libexadrums_0.3.0-1
> (#927229 requires libatomic on some architectures)
> that caused exadrums to FTBFS
> on armel mips mipsel m68k powerpc powerpcspe sh4.
> 
> This has been fixed in libexadrums 0.3.0-2.
> 
> Please give back exadrums in experimental once the fixed libexadrums
> is available on armel mips mipsel m68k powerpc powerpcspe sh4.
> 
> As far as I understand, there is no need for a Non-Maintainer Upload,
> and a give-back is implied by the dep-wait.
> 
>   dw exadrums_0.3.0-1 . armel mips mipsel m68k powerpc powerpcspe sh4 . experimental . -m 'libexadrums (>= 0.3.0-2)'

The dep-wait syntax expects binary packages. ;) Replacing libexadrums
with libexadrums-dev: done.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: