[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please give back elvish and golang-github-alecthomas-chroma on ppc64



Hi Breno,

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:57 AM, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:09:09AM -0700, Anthony Fok wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> There was a bug in golang-golang-x-sys-dev manifested in gccgo-8 that
>> caused elvish and golang-github-alecthomas-chroma to FTBFS on ppc64
>> architecture, see http://bugs.debian.org/891894 "golang-golang-x-sys:
>> redefinition of 'SyscallNoError' when building with gccgo 8".
>>
>> This has been fixed in golang-golang-x-sys-dev 0.0~git20180224.f6cff07-1.
>> Please give back elvish and golang-github-alecthomas-chroma on ppc64.
>>
>>   gb elvish_0.11+ds1-5 . ppc64
>>   gb golang-github-alecthomas-chroma_0.3.0-1 . ppc64
>
> I gave back both of them.

Thank you so much for your quick response!

Unfortunately, I probably requested the give-back too soon because
apparently golang-golang-x-sys-dev_0.0~git20180224.f6cff07-1 is too
new and hasn't reached all the mirrors yet, such that the new rebuilds
were still using the old version and thus failing the same way, e.g.

   Get:42 http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports unstable/main ppc64
golang-golang-x-sys-dev all 0.0~git20180126.0.ff2a66f-1 [227 kB]

(from https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=golang-github-alecthomas-chroma&arch=ppc64&ver=0.3.0-1&stamp=1519996712&raw=0)

My apologies for the trouble!  Maybe I should have waited a few more
hours before putting in the request.

If I read correctly,
http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/pool/main/g/golang-golang-x-sys/
now has the latest version
(golang-golang-x-sys-dev_0.0~git20180224.f6cff07-1_all.deb), and
http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/dists/unstable/main/binary-all/Packages.xz
lists the new version too.  So, if you don't mind, could you please do
the give back once again?

   gb elvish_0.11+ds1-5 . ppc64
   gb golang-github-alecthomas-chroma_0.3.0-1 . ppc64

Many thanks!

Cheers,
Anthony


Reply to: