Re: failed armhf build of xen 4.8.0~rc3-1 [and 1 more messages]
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:54:49PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: failed armhf build of xen 4.8.0~rc3-1 [and 1 more messages]"):
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:05:22PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Have I done something wrong ? Do the buildd chroots need to be
> > > updated ?
> >
> > The buildd chroots are automatically generated once a week. No
> > package that's installed in the chroot get upgraded without a
> > reason like a Depends requiring them.
>
> Ah. We were unlucky then that the broken bintuils ended up cached
> this way.
>
> > I'll see about upgrading the chroots, I have no idea how to do
> > this myself.
>
> Thanks. I do think this should be done, then, as other packages are
> likely to be affected.
>
> This probably applies to all the architectures, not just armhf and
> i386. The xen package for sid escaped the bug on amd64 because I
> built it myself.
I just gave back xen and set an extra depends for the fixed
version.
The chroots get updated on sunday and wednesday. It seems to be
easier to just wait for wednesday and give back those few that are
affected. It looks like all buildds actually need the new chroot.
Kurt
Reply to: