Hi, Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> (2016-07-23): > On 07/23/2016 11:05 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 22/07/16 16:50, Christian Seiler wrote: > >> nmu mksh_52c-2 . ALL . -m "Security: rebuild against newest dietlibc" > >> nmu mksh_52c-2exp3 . ALL . experimental . -m "Security: rebuild against newest dietlibc" > >> nmu util-vserver_0.30.216-pre3120-1.1 . ALL . -m "Security: rebuild against newest dietlibc" > > > > Scheduled. > > These packages have been building on _all_ architectures for a > very long time now (nearly 2 hours on some), while they typically > only have a build time of a couple of minutes (depending on the > architecture). Could you please take a look? I think there's > something wrong here and buildd resources are being wasted. > > (I just rechecked and the source packages of these binNMUs do > build fine in a clean pbuilder env, so I don't really know what > the problem could be though.) mksh seems installed now, various logs show: Build needed 00:02:29, 16240k disc space Build needed 00:02:37, 13340k disc space Build needed 00:04:14, 17736k disc space Those builds started past 20:00 UTC, so I suspect whatever happened at the time was fixed or so, and mksh built normally afterwards. mksh/experimental was uploaded but dak says REJECT, presumably because dpkg --compare-versions mksh_52c-2+b1 '<<' mksh_52c-2exp3+b1 fails (while it's OK for their non-binNMU counterparts). util-vserver looks installed everywhere. KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature