lör 2012-05-26 klockan 12:36 +0200 skrev Julien Cristau: > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 04:26:11 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote: > > > The failure om armel is the same that happened for a previous version > > (2.4.28-1.1). That version built successfully when given back. This one completed now. Thank you. > > The mips build failed during make check. Looking at the log I see no > > obvious error messages, so I hope this was a temporary issue. This one failed again. But on a different test. Looking closer at the logs, they both contain a line lika: kill: No such process This makes me suspect that the builds did not actually fail, but rather that they ware killed by either some watchdog script or some impatient build manager before they were expected to finish. The first build was killed after 3H29M. A recent successful build on the same host (alwyn) completed in 3H39M. The second build was killed after 13H17M. There have been no recent builds on this host (argento), but scaling the build time on this host of an older version (7H12M - ver 2.4.23-1) with the ratio of the build times of similar versions on a different host (3H4M - ver 2.4.28-1.1, 1H38M - ver 2.4.23-5, both in host ancina) gives an estimated build time of the current version on this host of 13H31M. So I would like to ask for it to be given back again - and please don't kill the build before it is expected to finish. > Racy tests should be fixed... Anyway, given back. > > Cheers, > Julien Mattias
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part