[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#629952: subversion fails to build for stable(-security) on kfreebsd



On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 07:13:35PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:33:34PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:45:22PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > On Thu, June 9, 2011 23:03, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [Thijs Kinkhorst]
> > > >> The last two security updates for subversion, 1.6.12dfsg-6 and
> > > >> 1.6.12dfsg-7,
> > > >> have failed to build on kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64. Attached are
> > > >> two
> > > >> sample build logs. Can you investigate this?
> > > >
> > > > It is a problem we've seen on _some_ but not all kfreebsd buildd hosts
> > > > for quite some time, and last we tried, Cyril could not reproduce it on
> > > > his own system.  One of the test suites starts up a server process on
> > > > localhost, connects to it, does some tests, and eventually kills the
> > > > server.  Starting the server, or connecting to it, is what appears to
> > > > be failing.  It works on all our Linux platforms, and it _used_ to work
> > > > on some of the kfreebsd buildds as well, though lately it seems to not
> > > > work on any of them.
> > > >
> > > > Is it valid to create a TCP based server on 127.0.0.1, connect to it,
> > > > then later kill it, in a build chroot?  If not, I guess I can disable
> > > > all those tests.  I've just always assumed that was a valid thing to do
> > > > in a package build.
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > I'm not a buildd expert, so I'm CC'ing some of those that are.
> > > 
> > > If it builds at least on some buildds (which ones?), it would help me in
> > > the sort term if we could get those buildds to build 1.6.12dfsg-6.
> > 
> > I think it builds fine on non-smp buildds, which at the time of the
> > Squeeze release were fano and finzi. They have been switched to SMP a
> > few weeks ago.
> > 
> > Maybe we should switch them back to non-SMP? Alternatively I can build
> > them manually to solve this situation, though it will only hide the
> > problem.
> 
> Can you upload manual builds? The archs need to be in sync for
> acceptance in the upcoming 6.0.4 point release of Squeeze.
> 

I have built both kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 versions on
non-SMP machines. I have just uploaded the resulting packages.


-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net


Reply to: