Hello, On šeštadienis 18 Birželis 2011 12:42:02 Modestas Vainius wrote: > On antradienis 14 Birželis 2011 18:58:51 Christoph Egger wrote: > > Modestas Vainius <modax@debian.org> writes: > > > Modestas Vainius <modax@debian.org> writes: > > >> please correct me if I'm wrong but I heard that you could give back > > >> packages in squeeze-backports. If so, please give back ktorrent on > > >> armel i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips s390. What's more, > > >> libktorrent/powerpc (also in squeeze-backports) seems to be stuck at > > >> Uploaded state for 2 days already. > > > > > > Is that the same for amarok which seems to have failed in a quite > > > similar way? > > > > And it does not work. Still fails > > This seems to be sbuild 0.61 problem (sbuild 0.60 works, e.g. mipsel > succeeded): > > sbuild (0.61.0-1) unstable; urgency=low > * sbuild: > - The apt and aptitude build dependency resolvers now use only the > first alternative in alternative dependencies. The other > alternatives are stripped out entirely. This makes the apt and > aptitude resolvers behave exactly like the internal resolver. > Note that this is configurable with the $resolve_alternatives > option, so alternative resolving may be re-enabled with this > option if desired. This is useful for e.g. backports, but not > for unstable where the strict consistency and reproducibility > offered by only using the first alternative is required. > > ... which can be fixed by setting $resolve_alternatives or upgrading to > sbuild 0.62.0: > > sbuild (0.62.0-1) unstable; urgency=low > ... > + The aptitude resolver can resolve complex dependencies, e.g. > A | B, where A is uninstallable now correctly falls back to B. > This is not the case for the internal or apt resolvers, which by > intent do not make use of alternatives (they use the first > alternative only. sbuild now has full support for resolving > alternatives, but this is not the default behaviour > (Closes: #403246). Please see #614807 for a proposed description > of autobuilder-imposed build dependency restrictions in Policy. > ... > > While previous 0.62.x releases were quite troublesome, 0.62.2 looks quite > decent. Any hope that bpo buildds will be fixed or upgraded? Has this issue (setting $resolve_alternatives or upgrading to >= sbuild 0.62.0) been solved for squeeze-backports. If not, is there anything I can do to help? -- Modestas Vainius <modax@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.