Hello, On the forwarded message Christian Perrier suggests on debian-arm mailing lists to setup an autobuilder for D-I using the official autobuilders for armel and i386. Would it fine with DSA and WB teams to do those setups? I could do armel setup but not i386 (which I think Phil Kern volunteer) Please, let me know your thoughts. If no complains I'll proceed with the task (sometime during this week, if possible). Best regards, -- Hector Oron PS.- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> Date: 2011/5/9 Subject: Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console) To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, joeyh@debian.org Quoting Martin Michlmayr (tbm@cyrius.com): > I actually tried to reproduce this problem on my ARM box yesterday and > couldn't. Joey, does your build nmachine have very little RAM? Can > you try to run mkdns323fw manually to see what's going on? > > (Unfortunately, the TS-209 image later on fails to build because of > size problems.) By the way, I use this opportunity to mention that Joey already said a couple of times he would be happy to drop builds on his machine in favor of an autobuilder. It probably "just" needs someone with the required knowledge and access to setup a daily build of D-I on the arm autobuilder. Is there someone who would be ableto do this among the ARM porters? PS: we have the same wish for i386 daily builds, actually. -- Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. "Our Sun unleashes tremendous flares expelling hot gas into the Solar System, which one day will disconnect us." -- Day DVB-T stop working nicely Video flare: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100510.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature