Hi, Am Freitag, den 11.06.2010, 21:30 +0200 schrieb Andreas Barth: > * Joachim Breitner (nomeata@debian.org) [100611 20:06]: > > Am Freitag, den 11.06.2010, 18:25 +0200 schrieb Andreas Barth: > > > What do you think? > > > > from a „user“ POV, I’m all for it. I find the current state quite > > confusing. > > I would tend to put the proper version number in all fields, and the > binnmu_* only to exist until the package reaches the installed state. > What do you think? I’d rather see the binNMU version in the installed_version field – after all, for that architecture, that is the version that is installed. When filing a binNMU it is confusing to first see it go from 1.0-1 (Installed) to 1.0-1+b1 (Needs-Build) to 1.0-1+b1 (Built) to 1.0-1 (Installed). I’d expect it to stay at 1.0-1+b1 (Installed), if you know what I mean. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part