Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 05.05.2010, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Bastian Blank: > On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 11:25:27AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > I’m always confused when after a successful binNMU, > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=missingh > > lists the source version as „version“, and not the version of the > > installed binary. > > There is no version of the installed binary. It is a set of versions. I > at least have one package with two disjunct version ranges for the > binaries. Also wanna-build always operates on source versions. hmm, so what does "installed-version" in the wb-database say for that package? (What package is it?) From reading the wanna-build source, it appends "+b?" to the source version if it finds a binary from that source containing a binary prefix. So I should not say “version of the installed binary” but “source version with binNMU suffix appended”. Maybe just adding the value of installed-version as a column of its own to /status/ would be the clearest and easiest. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part