Le dimanche 19 juillet 2009 à 13:17 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit : > Hello, > > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [2009-07-03 0:25 +0200]: > > In order to automatize the process, we'll modify the helper tools (debhelper and > > CDBS) > > I don't think you should rely on CDBS for that. In Ubuntu's > implementation, we currently divert dh_strip, so we just rely on > debhelper. Since cdbs always uses dh_strip -pfoo, it is not possible to build one debug package per source package without changes in cdbs. > However, if that is accepted, I'd much rather ban -dbg files > completely. They clutter the mirrors, package searches, inflate > Packages.gz, etc. The idea is to remove them progressively, as ftp-master would refuse them in all NEW uploads. > > - There's the question as to whether build one .ddeb per source package, or one > > per binary package. > > I vote for the latter, for two reasons: > > * Users think in terms of binary packages. Since we want to make their use completely transparent in the end, that doesn’t change many things for users. > * Often, source packages multibuild the same thing with different > options (think of the mplayer-k6 vs. mplayer-686 packages in the > past, or exim4-daemon-light vs. -heavy). You can't install both of > the debug symbols at the same time. You can install both at once, since they will have different build IDs. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=