On Sunday, March 16, 2025 4:55:25 PM Mountain Standard Time Bill Allombert wrote: > Le Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 11:44:21AM -0700, Soren Stoutner a écrit : > > ----- BACKGROUND STARTS ----- > > > The text of the current mailing list code of conduct states: > Hi Soren, > > In this text, at some point, you need to state under which article > of the Debian constitution this GR falls and why. It is covered under 4.1.3. "Make or override any decision authorised by the powers of the Project Leader or a Delegate." > After having done that, you may decide whether this GR is premature > because the avenues for resolving this issue without a GR have not > been exhausted. I do not think it is premature because of what I have written previously. “At this point in the discussion I would like to progress toward a decision.” “One way to do so would be a GR. On one hand, using a GR to modify one line of the code of conduct for the mailing list seems like a rather large hammer for a rather small problem. But on the other hand, many people feel strongly enough about this that a GR might be the only mechanism where people will feel like the outcome is fair.” “My question is, is there any other decision making process that would be preferable to a GR to decide this issue?” https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/03/msg00199.html I would be interested to hear if you are aware of any other decision making process that you think should decide this issue. For example, imagine that I opened a bug against l.d.o and the listmasters decided to implement the change I propose. Do you think those who are against that change would be satisfied by that process? -- Soren Stoutner soren@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.