Re: [RFC] General Resolution to deploy tag2upload
Gunnar Wolf writes ("Re: [RFC] General Resolution to deploy tag2upload"):
> Thanks, Joerg and Ian, for summing it up in this subthread and
> arriving at the mail I am quoting. I think that, if we are to vote on
> this topic, both sides to this disagreement should be made clear and
> explicit. The call for votes should include, or at least prominently
> link to, where the disagreement lies. Seeing this as an example of
> (failed) collaboration between two teams with differing goals, with
> both not willing to compromise in their position, makes it much
> clearer to those of us who have only watched at (quite) a distance.
Right.
Our the FAQ we're currently working on internally has an explanation
of this, and links to Sven's and Russ's posts
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2024/06/msg00224.html
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2024/06/msg00225.html
Obviously there is a limit to how much we want to try to speak for
ftpmaster, but I think their position has been fairly clearly restated
here.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Reply to: