Re: Question to candidates: what are your quantitative diversity goals and metrics?
>>>>> "Roberto" == Roberto C Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> writes:
Roberto> I can infer that you likely view the current ratio of around 3% women
Roberto> (33/1004) and around 96% men ((1004-33)/1004) [0] (and, yes, I recognize
Roberto> that this does not account for gender minority individuals, but I was
Roberto> not able to locate figures for that group). However, what is not clear
Roberto> is at what point, in your own view, the situation is imbalanced. Would
Roberto> you consider 65% men, 25% women, and 10% gender minority to have an
Roberto> overrepresentation of men?
Why does it matter?
It seems implausible that we would get from 3% women to a point where
we had a good gender balance in a year?
So why does the particular threshold matter at all?
Reply to: