Re: Possible draft non-free firmware option with SC change
Richard Laager <rlaager@debian.org> writes:
> I agree insofar as: E > B > C > NOTA > D
> I put A in a different spot: A > B > C. You have B > C > A.
> E is A plus the SC modification. With E as your first choice, why
> wouldn't you put A > B?
I'm concerned about the potential complications of a conflict with the SC
and would rather accept a different compromise than risk constitutional
confusion if we're not willing to change the SC.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: