[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware



On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 08:31:34PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 11:00:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> I think the problem is with "non-free section". I think Steve looks at
>> that like the non-free-firmware section is now allowed. I suggest you
>s/now/not/
>> just rewrite it as: "containing non-free software from the Debian
>> archive".
>
>Hi Kurt,
>
>Yes, let's do that, thanks. So here is the adapted proposal C:
>
>=================================
>
>The Debian project is permitted to make distribution media (installer images
>and live images) containing non-free software from the Debian archive available
>for download alongside with the free media in a way that the user is informed
>before downloading which media are the free ones.
>
>=================================

Thanks Bart, I'm much happier with this.

Seconded.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
"I used to be the first kid on the block wanting a cranial implant,
 now I want to be the first with a cranial firewall. " -- Charlie Stross

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: