Re: General Resolution: Change the resolution process: results
Marc Haber <mh+debian-vote@zugschlus.de> writes:
> The one we just had was tl;dr to me. The people pushing it gave me zero
> motivation to read it, I spent my spare time on my packages.
As the person proposing this GR, I think that's a perfectly reasonable
stance to take, and to be quite honest one of my goals was to *not* give
people a (negative) motivation to feel like they have to be involved. My
explicit goal (with one exception mentioned below) was to address various
process bugs in a straightforward way consistent with how we've been
informally behaving anyway. My hope was that the result would be quite
boring, and unless you're directly involved in a GR, hopefully no one will
notice.
The exception is the change to the maximum discussion length, as
previously discussed, which is a real, substantive change. However, not
everyone is going to have a strong feeling about that one way or the
other.
I for one will be watching closely to see if the new maximum discussion
length causes problems in practice, since I understand the basis for
Wouter's concern, and if it seems like it's causing significant issues,
consider proposing another GR to fix it. But we'll need to go through a
few GRs first to see how it goes.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: