Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware
- To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware
- From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:34:34 +0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 88b6e658717fcf036ada6feb05b570ba134a7a33.camel@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <8e41dcaaabf07cb8f7c3dcaaf6c6185c5438f929.camel@debian.org>
- References: <874jy4g7li.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <YwOLLWRtZPNqN3f7@isildor.loewenhoehle.ip> <87edx846ur.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <YwOncOIuTRuHciYV@isildor.loewenhoehle.ip> <YwOtwPWtzFKQuoEF@master.debian.org> <YwOvl0YrAC7pRTpd@iiec.unam.mx> <YwPB0S84FT8okrHt@einval.com> <87y1vf2vdx.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <YwTeTawYH81BBGZW@einval.com> <87zgfv9dgz.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <YwUI3LM1KwqC0ggs@mithrandir.lan.emorrp1.name> <87bksa6dwv.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <8e41dcaaabf07cb8f7c3dcaaf6c6185c5438f929.camel@debian.org>
On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 09:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 19:57 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
> > My reading of that is that the FSF RYF program does not meet the needs
> > of people who do not care about having a fully free software system.
>
> My reading of it was the opposite, that the FSF RYF program doesn't
> take into account the potential for reverse engineering of firmware
PS: if there is anyone interested in reforming the FSF RYF program,
I note the FSF are hiring someone to lead the program and other things:
https://www.fsf.org/resources/jobs/fsf-job-opportunity-licensing-and-compliance-manager
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Reply to: