On 2022-03-27 19:31, felix.lechner@lease-up.com wrote: > Would you please explain why Option 2 defeated NOTA by 124 votes but at > the same time defeated Option 3, which was identical to NOTA, by only 35 > votes? This seems to be inline with what the proposer intended, though. From the text of Choice 3: > [...] which is also why I explicitly want to see "keep the status > quo" on the ballot, and not only as "NOTA", but as a real option. Best, Christian