Dear Mr. Secretary, As a Second for the winning Option 2, I was personally happy with last night's vote, but I nonetheless object to your certification of these tentative results: > Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 142 - 107) = 35 votes. > Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 185 - 61) = 124 votes. Would you please explain why Option 2 defeated NOTA by 124 votes but at the same time defeated Option 3, which was identical to NOTA, by only 35 votes? Did 89 folks vote 3-2-NOTA (or a variation thereof involving Option 1)? If so, did Option 2 pass the majority test only because Option 3 was available separately? I believe the vote should be redone. A repeat without Option 3 is needed so that your certified results can properly reflect the electorate's position with respect to the question posed on the ballot while also honoring our constitutional majority requirement. Thank you! Respectfully, Felix Lechner
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature