On Sat, Mar 05, 2022 at 11:42:03AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > [...] Just > > voting on "I want my vote to be secret" without having any information > > about the other properties is IMO completely silly and looses the point. exactly. > Sam's GR intentionally leaves the details open to the Project Secretary to > determine. I understand why people might object to that and would prefer > to require a GR for any change to the process. Yes. > I just wouldn't > characterize that as "rushed" (it's a deliberate choice, and hasn't been > made in a hurry so far as I can tell), so wasn't sure if that was the > objection here or if there was something else I was missing. And I'd call this 'rushed' still. If someone promises foo without explaining how foo should be achieved and then a vote is held to mandate foo, I'd call this 'rushed'. Even if there has been talk about foo for a year, which btw, by Debian standards, is not a long time. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ If a monkey hoarded more bananas than it could eat, while most of the other monkeys starved, scientists would study that monkey to figure out what the heck was wrong with it. When humans do it, we put them on the cover of Forbes.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature