Re: Reaffirm public voting
Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> writes:
> And then, early 2022 is not the time for rushed changes like this, which
> is also why I explicitly want to see "keep the status quo" on the ballot,
> and not only as "NOTA", but as a real option.
We've been talking about secret votes for about nine months now, so I'm
not sure "rushed" is the word that you're looking for. Concretely, it's
leaving me unclear what would make the change feel not rushed to you.
I understand if you are opposed to secret voting in general, but this
feels like a different objection than general opposition to the idea.
Could you be a bit clearer about what would make a proposal not rushed
(whether or not you would then support it)? Are you specifically asking
that we agree on the full details of implementation before passing a GR
allowing for it? Or something else?
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: