Re: Amendment: Keep e-mail while allowing other options in addition [Re: GR: Hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote]
Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> writes:
> I propose the following amendment to this ballot option, which if
> rejected I propose as its own option:
Just for clarity's sake for everyone following, since this process is now
a bit different, there is no longer a formal amendment process like this.
You just propose another ballot option directly. Sam can amend his
proposal provided that all of the current sponsors agree, but that doesn't
require anyone else to make a formal amendment and it's unrelated to the
ballot options.
That doesn't change anything about how you proposed this, but it does mean
that the next steps are a tiny bit different than they were. Sam can
indicate whether he intends to do that or not, and if not, you'll want to
propose a full ballot option (in other words, will probably want to
duplicate more of Sam's text or refer to the other option similar to how
Wouter did in the last GR).
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: