Ballot option 2 - Merely hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote and allow verification
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I like this option. Let's place it on the ballot. Thanks!
Kind regards,
Felix Lechner
On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 5:44:34 PM EST Judit Foglszinger wrote:
> I propose a ballot option for the GR
> "Hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote"
> that makes the following changes to the constitution.
>
> 1) Do not make the identity of a voter casting a particular vote public.
>
> 6) Codify that our election system must permit independent verification
> of the outcome given the votes cast and must permit developers to
> confirm their vote is included in the votes cast.
>
> So it's the proposed GR minus the changes
> not directly related to introducing secret votes.
>
> I ask for seconds aka sponsors for this Option.
>
> Rationale
> =========
>
> Give the opportunity to vote for secret voting without needing to
> additionally vote for unrelated/only slightly related
> constitution changes;
> for example for the change of mode of voting
> from email to something not defined.
>
> As it was mentioned in the discussion,
> there might be no consensus on which options are direcly related -
> This option regards the need to allow verification (6))
> as directly related to secret votes, because otherwise
> they would become completely unverifiable.
>
> Summary of Changes
> ==================
>
> 1) Do not make the identity of a voter casting a particular vote
> public.
>
> 6) Codify that our election system must permit independent verification
> of the outcome given the votes cast and must permit developers to
> confirm their vote is included in the votes cast.
>
>
> <h3>4.2. Procedure</h3>
> @@ -228,9 +246,10 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed later.</cite></p>
> <p>
> Votes are taken by the Project Secretary. Votes, tallies, and
> results are not revealed during the voting period; after the
> vote the Project Secretary lists all the votes {+cast in sufficient
> detail that anyone may verify the outcome of the election from the votes
> cast. The+} {+ identity of a developer casting a particular vote is
> not made+} {+ public, but developers will be given an option to
> confirm their vote is included in the votes+} cast.
>
> @@ -371,8 +390,7 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed later.</cite></p>
> necessary.</li>
>
> <li>The next two weeks are the polling period during which
> Developers may cast their votes. [-Votes in leadership elections are-]
> [- kept secret, even after the election is finished.</li>-]{+</li>+}
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Tq8c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: