[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Secret Ballots: Handling Disagreement with the Secretary

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 02:30:53PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> My reason (and maybe Holger's too) is I'd say that there is no
> possibility of guaranteeing real permanent absolute secrecy in a vote
> that we can practically conduct over the Internet (at least, not one
> where the results are also trustworthy), so there is going to be some
> sort of compromise, and it is essential to understand the nature of that
> compromise in order to come to any conclusion about whether it might be
> a good idea to do the the thing that we're really talking about.

yes, exactly this. Thank you.


 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C

This too shall pass.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: