Re: General Resolution: Change the resolution process: results
- To: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: General Resolution: Change the resolution process: results
- From: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 11:47:32 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] YflyNJIree1ZZbcg@mosca.iiec.unam.mx>
- In-reply-to: <8735l3d71r.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>
- References: <YfbGr8GNqCZRklUv@roeckx.be> <f41730bb6f84d13f71f07a941d55cff517020a61.camel@bzed.de> <YfgpNppOzMl5s1n1@torres.zugschlus.de> <8735l3d71r.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>
Russ Allbery dijo [Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 11:44:16AM -0800]:
> As the person proposing this GR, I think that's a perfectly reasonable
> stance to take, and to be quite honest one of my goals was to *not* give
> people a (negative) motivation to feel like they have to be involved. My
> explicit goal (with one exception mentioned below) was to address various
> process bugs in a straightforward way consistent with how we've been
> informally behaving anyway. My hope was that the result would be quite
> boring, and unless you're directly involved in a GR, hopefully no one will
> notice.
>
> The exception is the change to the maximum discussion length, as
> previously discussed, which is a real, substantive change. However, not
> everyone is going to have a strong feeling about that one way or the
> other.
I think your GR brought up more than this change -- Clarification of
concepts, such as the "Further Discussion" → "None of the above" or
"Amendments" → "Ballot options" will increase readability of our
processes, and ease the way for newcomers to understand what's going
on.
Reply to: