Re: REPOST, SIGNED: Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 01:08:50PM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Am 03.04.21 um 10:25 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > Craig, if you make this a new separate GR I will be glad to sponsor it.
>
> Do you (or anybody actually) have a idea how to deal best with the old RMS
> GR if this one is formally accepted?
One option would be to run both in parallel.
The anti-witch-hunt option would have been option [G] had there not been
a public request that someone should call for a vote 1.5 hours after the
unsigned version of this amendment was proposed, it would sound logical
to ask for it to be voted at the same time even now that it has been
forced to turn this into a separate GR.
> Regards,
> Micha
cu
Adrian
Reply to: