hi, i'm just following along, so please excuse my brief comments from the sidelines... On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:15:18AM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote: > Wouter and I are going to disagree on this, but I actually think that > the work I did during the latest systemd vote significantly helped move > the discussion forward. By trying to listen to various sides and trying > to present several options I think I managed to frame the process in a > way that was more constructive. > > I'm sure that process can be refined. But I'd rather see DPLs do that > work more rather than less. > > I also don't want to see that work restricted to the DPL. In many cases > I'd rather see ballot options drafted by people in the middle rather > than by strong proponents of a polarized position. actually I'm not so sure I want the DPL to be regularily involved in such activities. Undoubtfully these activities are usefull, but I fear they might be less useful when done by the DPL... [this is a generic remark, not based on the systemd vote.] > 1) Remember that we want to move toward secret ballots. Do *we*, really? I'm not sure I like the idea but at least I recall some people discussing this. Also I'm pretty sure many people^wDebian members have not even heard this being discussed. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ If you upload your address book to "the cloud", I don't want to be in it.
Description: PGP signature