Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes: > The process I'm proposing arguably favors the opposite side from my own in > the TC decision that primarily prompted this change and would have > prevented the process that indeed happened. ... > But with the benefit of a few > years of hindsight and watching subsequent GRs, I think a simpler process > with clearer rules and less flexibility would have had a better social > outcome for the project. I think you're right. FWIW, the idea that any TC vote so evenly split that a casting vote might be required by the chair should instead transition to a GR is growing on me. > I find having an explicit process to use as a structure for navigating a > disagreement to be calming and supportive. Amen. > It's easy to be part of a community when everyone agrees. It's powerful > and delightful to be part of a community when people disagree but the > community still works together with respect and mutual support. Creating > process that allows myself and others to do this more easily is part of > how I enjoy contributing to a community. Russ, this is a brilliant expression of why I so strongly value your participation in Debian. Thank you for being here. Bdale
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature