[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms

On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 12:20:22PM +0100, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > > Language quip: Not "invited to do this in person" (personally flying
> > > to wherever signatures are being gathered), but "in a personal
> > > capacity" or "as an individual action"... ?  

> > I think the intention was clear, but I'm fine with a version which 
> > changes that part as suggested above and my seconds extends to such a 
> > version.

> Exactly my thoughts. I would be glad to hear from a native speaker if the
> wording is really capable of being misunderstood. Otherwise I just would let
> go. But I second also the proposed version, preferable using then "as an
> individual action".

"in person" has a pretty unambiguous meaning in (American?) English
referring to physical presence, so is the wrong thing to say here for your

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: