Re: Proposal to overturn init systems premature GR
Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> writes:
> I note that our voting system does have recourse for people who believe
> that the vote is called to early.
>
> They can vote FD above other options.
> And in this specific case, voting G>FD> other options
> would send a clear message that we should develop options based on G.
This is true, but unhelpful - it would obviously be a "nuclear" option,
so I suspect that even people who think that will be reluctant to
restart this entire discussion all over again.
The right answer is to give people another couple of days to get the
last option sorted out. That doesn't stop everyone being able to vote in
good time, and is obviously fair to everyone.
Regards,
Matthew
--
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."
http://www.debian.org
Reply to: