Re: Proposal: Reaffirm our commitment to support portability and multiple implementations
Guillem Jover writes ("Proposal: Reaffirm our commitment to support portability and multiple implementations"):
> ----X<----
> Title: Reaffirm our commitment to support portability and multiple implementations
I really like much of what you write in your proposal.
However, unfortunately, I don't think this is sufficient to resolve
the actual practical questions which keep coming up.
I think your proposal would work well as a preamble to many of the
other options, notably mine and Dmitry's.
I hesitate to add such a lot of text to my own proposal which is
already rather long. I don't know what to do about this precisely.
I'm not sure whether it would make sense to have two versions of mine
with and without such a preamble ?
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Reply to: