[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed amendment to Proposal D

Steve Langasek writes ("Proposed amendment to Proposal D"):
> I'd like to propose an amendment to your proposal D, to strike the sentence:
>   We are disappointed that this has had to involve another GR.
> I have not decided yet how I'm going to vote in this GR, but I think that
> the above sentence can only weaken support for your proposal by conflating
> the question of what our init system policy should be, with meta commentary
> on the procedure used to decide that policy.
> I personally find it more difficult to support this proposal because of this
> mixing of concerns.

Thanks for this feedback.  I have received a private email in support
of your comment.

Unless anyone objects by 1400 UTC on Wednesday, I intend to accept
this amendment, assuming that this is procedurally kosher.


Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.

Reply to: