Re: Proposed amendment to Proposal D
Steve Langasek writes ("Proposed amendment to Proposal D"):
> I'd like to propose an amendment to your proposal D, to strike the sentence:
> We are disappointed that this has had to involve another GR.
> I have not decided yet how I'm going to vote in this GR, but I think that
> the above sentence can only weaken support for your proposal by conflating
> the question of what our init system policy should be, with meta commentary
> on the procedure used to decide that policy.
> I personally find it more difficult to support this proposal because of this
> mixing of concerns.
Thanks for this feedback. I have received a private email in support
of your comment.
Unless anyone objects by 1400 UTC on Wednesday, I intend to accept
this amendment, assuming that this is procedurally kosher.
Ian Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.