[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Time Line

On 11/15/19 12:58 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> "Ian" == Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
>     Ian> Sam Hartman writes ("Proposal: General Resolution on Init
>     Ian> Systems and systemd Facilities"):
>     >> Timeline:
>     Ian> Please can we have more time.
> If you're worried about still finalizing wording or what happens if
> we're actively in a productive discussion refiding the words of one of
> the viable proposals, sure, I'd  make sure we had more time.
> But I think two weeks is enough time to judge basic support and
> viability of a proposal.


You've started all this, and imposed it to all of us. Some of us
probably didn't want this to happen at all (another systemd discussion
and GR, really?!?), but I still respect your view and your position as a
DPL. However, as we're in it because you decided to go for it, it is my
view that imposing your agenda is questionable. I find it unacceptable
that you're adding pressure, and you seem to be unwilling to give Ian
all the time he needs to prepare a nice text, which I'm sure he will do
in a timely fashion anyways.

We all have $day-job stuff to care, and Ian probably also needs time to
think of ways to write things. A week or 2 wont change anything, and
probably not the outcome. However, better wording and greater ideas could.


Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Reply to: