On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 07:57:11AM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > > Like it or not, but there *is* a big difference in the project making > > > something available for the big wide world (which a public NEW would > > > be), or a user putting it somewhere readable for everyone even though > > > the latter might be using project resources too. > > > > What is the big (legal) difference between distributing something > > from the Debian group on the Debian machine salsa.debian.org, and > > distributing the same from a different Debian machine? > > People are mirroring the Debian pool under a set of well-understood norms, as > that's what the Debian project "produces" (think of the mirror network, people > pressing CDs, etc). A .deb in a Debian suite in the Debian pool isn't > comparable to a random .deb, as only the former has the Debian-seal-of- > approval (DFSG & fulfills releasability criterias). > > Salsa is not meant to be mirrored by third-parties, and really shouldn't. But that equally applies to NEW. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature