Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements
- To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements
- From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:23 +0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAKTje6GEjsCtyewOmQTTEc5jBNV71Rd5iTaw2U2bJ8fyfPngLg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20180331221158.GG9516@localhost>
- References: <1522093681.23766.9.camel@liw.fi> <1522136314.23766.11.camel@liw.fi> <1522313896.765572.1319993880.510A388E@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20180330194447.GZ9516@localhost> <1522446930.573658.1321758280.2EA8587A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20180331123756.GB9516@localhost> <87h8owc60r.fsf@delenn.ganneff.de> <20180331221158.GG9516@localhost>
On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 6:11 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> What is the big (legal) difference between distributing something
> from the Debian group on the Debian machine salsa.debian.org, and
> distributing the same from a different Debian machine?
The big difference appears to be the Social Contract (and DFSG), which
we generally don't seem to apply to alioth/salsa, especially because
they often contain full upstream development history, which might or
might not contain non-free material.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: