Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 17:26:23 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20170114002623.sowuhzn4tmx6dsfr@iris.silentflame.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4460181.cTH2Yvpqos@kitterma-e6430>
References: <[🔎] 20170110020819.h7dyrqxvywotn22r@hephaestus.silentflame.com> <[🔎] 9272D417-8C47-4BC8-BAE1-3E575845E14B@kitterman.com> <[🔎] 20170112212659.ma2u5nlgpos35kth@iris.silentflame.com> <[🔎] 4460181.cTH2Yvpqos@kitterma-e6430>

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 04:39:05PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> That then has the opposite problem.  It clearly narrows the notion of not 
> hiding problems and I don't think that's good either.

Good point.

> P.S.  I am subscribed.  Please don't cc me.

Whoops, sorry about that.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
- Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
- Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
- Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Next by Date: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Next by thread: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread